<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Angelina Jolie: A Mockery to Virgin Mary</title>
	<link>http://www.niquehappy.com/blog/2007/01/07/angelina-jolie-is-virgin-mary/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Martha Jane</title>
		<link>http://www.niquehappy.com/blog/2007/01/07/angelina-jolie-is-virgin-mary/#comment-21641</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.niquehappy.com/blog/2007/01/07/angelina-jolie-is-virgin-mary/#comment-21641</guid>
					<description>Please re-read that first comment. I would add that not only is the artist criticizing "a culture that deifies celebrities," but she's definitely making "lite" of kitschy religious art. The style and the subject matter are a good match, and the piece is well-done. Even if Angelina deserved to be "worshipped," is that kind of worship good for anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please re-read that first comment. I would add that not only is the artist criticizing &#8220;a culture that deifies celebrities,&#8221; but she&#8217;s definitely making &#8220;lite&#8221; of kitschy religious art. The style and the subject matter are a good match, and the piece is well-done. Even if Angelina deserved to be &#8220;worshipped,&#8221; is that kind of worship good for anyone?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: filip</title>
		<link>http://www.niquehappy.com/blog/2007/01/07/angelina-jolie-is-virgin-mary/#comment-10361</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.niquehappy.com/blog/2007/01/07/angelina-jolie-is-virgin-mary/#comment-10361</guid>
					<description>well, she is prettier than virgin mary thats for sure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, she is prettier than virgin mary thats for sure
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AMANDA</title>
		<link>http://www.niquehappy.com/blog/2007/01/07/angelina-jolie-is-virgin-mary/#comment-2732</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.niquehappy.com/blog/2007/01/07/angelina-jolie-is-virgin-mary/#comment-2732</guid>
					<description>This is horrible!! She is absoloutly no role model or even close to being of a high ststus as the Virgin Mary. Shame on the artist who did this, I hope the management takes it off, QUICK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is horrible!! She is absoloutly no role model or even close to being of a high ststus as the Virgin Mary. Shame on the artist who did this, I hope the management takes it off, QUICK
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: St. Izzy of Cayce</title>
		<link>http://www.niquehappy.com/blog/2007/01/07/angelina-jolie-is-virgin-mary/#comment-1082</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.niquehappy.com/blog/2007/01/07/angelina-jolie-is-virgin-mary/#comment-1082</guid>
					<description>In general, the artist agrees with you, and your points about AJ only make the artist's message stronger.  The whole point of the piece is not to lionize the actress, but to criticize a culture that deifies celebrities, especially when the celebrities' lives are so far from being good role models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In general, the artist agrees with you, and your points about AJ only make the artist&#8217;s message stronger.  The whole point of the piece is not to lionize the actress, but to criticize a culture that deifies celebrities, especially when the celebrities&#8217; lives are so far from being good role models.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
