I’m sure by now, you must’ve seen People magazine’s pictures of celebrities who volunteered to have their pictures taken without any makeup on and are still considered “world’s most beautiful”. Being that our site is known for stars without makeup pictures, we just had to do something about it.

Although People mag claims these stars didn’t wear any makeup - and they probably didn’t - but we feel the pictures were somewhat biased. They conveniently “forgot” to mention the photography and lighting factors in making these stars still look “beautiful.”

Here’s Jessica Biel looking all “beautiful” wearing no makeup from the shoot. But have you seen her without makeup in real life?

And Eva Longoria. The first picture is taken from the magazine. Sure, she didn’t have any makeup on, but c’mon - don’t you think the makeup artists must have applied “natural looking” beauty elements to help illuminate her face? Plus, you can obviously see the airbrushing and the lighting going on to make her look skinnier or her neck look higher and slimmer, like this. And compare that one with the rest of the real natural pictures. Notice the skin. Yikes.

And here’s Drew Barrymore, who was named the world’s most beautiful woman. These pictures just tell me - not so much. I liked her in 50 First Dates, so I have nothing against her. Just wanted to show a little bit of comparison. She looks really normal in the other “natural” pics. There’s obviously A LOT of light in that first pic. I mean, if she’s “most beautiful” we should be too, then, right?

And finally, Jessica Alba. Black and white photography combined with a lot of lighting - that will certainly make anyone look flawless. I’m pretty sure they erased every bit of pimple off her face. Compare to the rest of the other pics of her without makeup. She may not be ugly without makeup, but to be the world’s most beautiful? Might want to think again.