March 6th, 2008 at 10:54 pm

Nicole Kidman, Err, Still Classically Beautiful?

in: Stars Without Makeup, Galleries, Polls

nicolekidmanwithoutmakeup | niquehappy.com

I’ve always considered Nicole Kidman one of those female stars that’s got it all - the beauty, the classiness, the elegance, etc. Her Chanel No. 5 commercials were very “movie-like” and very well-done. But ever since she decided to inject botox on her lips, my level of respect for her has hit an all-time low. And now these pictures of her shopping for baby clothes are telling me she has aged about five hundred years. Granted, she’s 40 - but at this point, she’s going to need all the glam she can get. So this comparison here isn’t really “Nicole Kidman without makeup” - it’s more like “Nicole Kidman without glam” or “Nicole Kidman without botox.” Whichever one you feel fitting.

Does Nicole Kidman need to be glammed up to be beautiful?

View Results

Loading ... Loading …
3
  • 1

    EEEEEEEKKKKK!!!!! She’s going bald! What the heck happened to her?

    Melissa on March 7th, 2008
  • 2

    I love the fact you Americans think she’s so classy and beautiful. It’s so funny. Before she hooked up with Tom Cruise (as his beard) she was an awkward ginger freckly nobody. Far from beautiful. Look up some early pics of her from when she lived in Australia. Believe me she looks a hell of a lot better in this pic than in most of those.

    Larissa on March 8th, 2008
  • 3

    Yuch,

    looks like my mother in law;P

    Mr. Holland on April 7th, 2008

 

RSS feed for comments on this post | TrackBack URI

 

1. Comments will be moderated and modified before they are posted, for any reasons editors feel are appropriate.

2. If you're commenting on Stars Without Makeup Galleries, please read this and this first.

3. Please be sure to enter a valid email address so that we can reply to your comments, if needed.

 

Thank you for your support!
Create a Meebo Chat Room