Comments on: Angelina Jolie Without Makeup

by: R

Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:38:14 +0000

I must ask, what does any of you know about either Jolie or Aniston? They are both beautiful women, and that picture of Jolie is a horrible one, and you know, however much you hate to admit it, that she wears little to no make-up normally (anyone who knows just a tad about make-up can see that), so there really can’t be that big a difference (and there isn’t. I saw an interview on youtube.. don’t remember the name of it, but it had somethingt to do with refugees I think. You can try to look it up on youtube). Anyway, the worst thing about this forum is not the denial of either of their beauty, the obvious jealousy from you girls, nor the fact, that even though you may not like Angelina’s personality (as if you know anything subtantial about her), it does nothing to alter her physical appearance. You may find her less attractive because you don’t like the person that you make her out to be, but she is still beautiful, and you really can’t deny that. And what is up with all the competition between Angelina And Jennifer? It’s OLD NEWS! They’re both great. Seriously, do you never tire of talking about something that is dead?

And to you Kara. People do change. She has admitted to all those things, however, she is very open about her past. I don’t know about you, but visiting refugee camps would definately make me reconsider me and my life, as it has done to her. I don’t see why people find THAT hard to believe? She saw that she had nothing to be sad about, and is aware that her destructive nature in her younger years were unhealthy and damaging, but there is no way to change what she did and who she was, so why not focus on who she is?

And just beacuse someone doesn’t fit your description of normal, doesn’t mean they are gross and what ever. We all have our strange and darker sides. And there ae always things that no one will know about us. But we are not all celebrities with the media poking their nose in our business. And who cares how many kids she has? GOODNESS! It is none of our business! There are still many people with heaps of children, and people just go “Oh, that strange” or “how do they find the energy to…”, but with her it’s gross and disgusting? They are children, and she can probably give them a better life than any of you can give your children. I must say, celebrity bashing is something I find very pathetic, and that it most often is taken out on the women (probably the whole jealousy issue).

by: niquehappy

Tue, 27 May 2008 18:26:37 +0000

Hey guys,

I recently noticed someone pumped up the poll here voting over 300 times in one day, in favor of Angelina Jolie. I’m not sure how that was even possible but it is not cool. I could leave it that way to make our site look popular, but that’s not what we’re about, so I’ve edited the poll to reflect the RIGHT # of legit votes. If this person does it again, their IP address will be filtered and banned. We don’t want to get that far, but the whole point of this polling feature is for everyone to have a say in things, and have fun with it.

I appreciate everyone who voted and has been supporting the site over the years. You guys rock!

Thanks,
-NiqueHappy.com Editor

by: M

Tue, 27 May 2008 11:43:53 +0000

Go Kara! Couldnt have said it better myself. She doesnt look too bad in this pix but shes a disgusting person in real life. Jennfer Aniston may not be that great either but she definatley wins by default. At least shes a nice person.

by: J.D

Tue, 27 May 2008 03:28:33 +0000

SLUT

by: nina

Mon, 26 May 2008 15:28:01 +0000

Without makeup, angelina is not ugly but nothing much to look at. She looks like an everyday housewife to me.

by: sam

Mon, 26 May 2008 04:57:34 +0000

what are you talking about greg? the people who made this site make fun of jennifer just much as they do about angelina, so don’t try to blame them for angelinas ugliness

by: Kara

Mon, 26 May 2008 04:53:20 +0000

Not everyone hates Angelina because she is with Brad Pitt or because they like Jennifer Aniston. Some people don’t like the fact that less than ten years ago she was a dirty whore and weirdo who liked to cut herself and kill small animals for kicks. (She admits this herself) Then she wins an oscar and gets all this attention. She buys a kid to seem caring, and starts to change her image. All of a sdden she’s this great person, jetsetting around buying up the world’s poor, having the perfect family. Sorry Greg, she gets called a whore because she is one. A fame whore.
She may seem attractive, but she’s ugly inside.

by: GREG

Mon, 26 May 2008 00:14:51 +0000

I don’t know where the hell you got that pic of Jolie, but she does not look like that without makeup. She happens to look often off film the same as on camera. She is known for her beauty au naturel — even often on screen, but certainly off. In ads, there ,of course, is make up and retouching , but if you were truly interested in accuracy and reality, you can view her easily out with the kids, or shopping with them and Brad. You’re stacking the deck, as it were, by using a questionable pic to make your case, and to prove your point that Aniston is the more attractive. She is an attractive actress with seemingly blond, long hair — like most in Hollywood — does not (however, hard you guys try) make her a natural beauty in the world’s and the ages’ definition. Preferring Aniston over Jolie is fine, but why can’t you paranoids prefer her without the defensive and offensive language with regard to Jolie?

by: Freya

Mon, 26 May 2008 00:05:22 +0000

Angelina looks fine without makeup. Her face is symmetrical. She’s very photogenic.